Hello one and all this is a special blog based on an Urban Geography field trip in my nation’s capital Port-Of-Spain on march the 22^nd . For the first objective of the trip we were split into groups to do place checks. Which is basically a qualitative data collection method that is geared around assessing the qualities of a given place , recommendations to improve it and possibly working with the partners to achieve such changes.

My group’s specific target for the place check was the International waterfront center. We strolled up, down and to an extent around this scenic area gathering information via pictures and notes. In grouping back with the team in the HYATT’s open outdoor lounge area we discussed our thoughts with each other. Perhaps it might have been the persuasion of the soft cushions, gentle breeze and the ambient music that led to the overall acceptance of the area. The majority liked that the area was open, clean and scenic with few issues with the area. One issue that came up was security for we observed what appeared to be a homeless man washing his clothes in the water with the creative use of some shoe laces as a sinker. It was that simple instance that made me dig deeper in thought than the impressive architecture and seemingly rich ambiance. I began to wonder how open this so called open space is. Who is really allowed to come on the waterfront I wondered?

The above picture depicts a no entry zone in an open area.

The more I thought about it the less open the area seemed as the code of conduct is set and in that sense there is a limit to the freedom of expression that should be enjoyed in an open space. The chain link barricade above may be overlooked by many but to me it represented a barrier to a so called open space. The fact that we were told we could not pass in certain areas further dispelled the illusion that I first witlessly accepted. I reevaluated the place mentally from the breakfast shed go back to the restricted area. The shed itself served local food but what is the cost of waterfront rent? The background motif that gave the impression of building a sense of identity and patriotism was under closer inspection constructed with a cheap foam material. It was painted and sculpted in a way to give the impression that it were stone. To me this emphasized the superficiality of the waterfront itself to me for does the public really benefit from this space? Or are they led to believe so and wear fancy clothes they can’t afford and drink cocktails that cost two times more than that of the local bar down by the corner? I view the water front as a privatized public space due to its restrictions and to me this is something that should be improved or worked on if possible. 

The second aspect if our field inquiry was a tour of Belmont with the Freetown Foundation. After hearing what seemed a very passionate dance of words from our tour master Mr. Scantlebury we were off on our way. He informed us that Belmont is the first suburb of P-O-S. and told us about the Freetown Foundation’s goals for Belmont. Which essentially is preserving its heritage and to regain their sense of pride. On observation Belmont has an interesting spatial geography and one could understand why it may be considered as urban sprawl creeping at the foot of the mountain. The architecture within Belmont was a mix of Colonial and current day and there was also an abundance of closed business areas. Belmont had the feeling of a friendly ghost town.

Colonial design of the  Trinidad Theater Workshop 

The problems that Belmont is faced with look quite similar to that of other Caribbean suburbs i.e crime and lack of proper infrastructure. However it was portrayed to us that Belmont is no Picton or Laventille and that crime comes from outside the community to cause trouble within. Belmont is rich with personality and  unique character with significant  contribution to Trinidad Carnival as produced  the fancy sailor and many mass bands. I sense that at one point in time Belmont was once the place to be as I could close my eyes and picture all the colonial buildings new and businesses flourishing adding more presence to its cramped streets. It is because of this I could understand what Mr Scantlebury seek at restoring that price and sense of place in this suburban area.

Unlike the case with the waterfront the Freetown foundation acknowledges what their current situation is and seeks to improve themselves whereas the international waterfront poses a misleading classy image. It is understood that the two are not the same but I would feel a stronger sense of belonging within the Belmont community than that with the more modern waterfront. Both areas are in definite need or work however to become more efficient in there function. The waterfront needs more characteristic life and culture of that of our own Trinidadian society and not fall into a generalized eurocentric styled liming spot at a public space should represent the broader populations over the niche. For Belmont to be a successful residential area there should be more interaction with the older heads ant the younger ones to promote the rebuilding of its community  as it is clear that the elders have a lot to share.